+++ /dev/null
-/**
-Create an opaque type, which hides its internal details from the public, and can only be created by being used explicitly.
-
-The generic type parameter can be anything. It doesn't have to be an object.
-
-[Read more about opaque types.](https://codemix.com/opaque-types-in-javascript/)
-
-There have been several discussions about adding this feature to TypeScript via the `opaque type` operator, similar to how Flow does it. Unfortunately, nothing has (yet) moved forward:
- - [Microsoft/TypeScript#15408](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15408)
- - [Microsoft/TypeScript#15807](https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/15807)
-
-@example
-```
-import {Opaque} from 'type-fest';
-
-type AccountNumber = Opaque<number, 'AccountNumber'>;
-type AccountBalance = Opaque<number, 'AccountBalance'>;
-
-// The Token parameter allows the compiler to differentiate between types, whereas "unknown" will not. For example, consider the following structures:
-type ThingOne = Opaque<string>;
-type ThingTwo = Opaque<string>;
-
-// To the compiler, these types are allowed to be cast to each other as they have the same underlying type. They are both `string & { __opaque__: unknown }`.
-// To avoid this behaviour, you would instead pass the "Token" parameter, like so.
-type NewThingOne = Opaque<string, 'ThingOne'>;
-type NewThingTwo = Opaque<string, 'ThingTwo'>;
-
-// Now they're completely separate types, so the following will fail to compile.
-function createNewThingOne (): NewThingOne {
- // As you can see, casting from a string is still allowed. However, you may not cast NewThingOne to NewThingTwo, and vice versa.
- return 'new thing one' as NewThingOne;
-}
-
-// This will fail to compile, as they are fundamentally different types.
-const thingTwo = createNewThingOne() as NewThingTwo;
-
-// Here's another example of opaque typing.
-function createAccountNumber(): AccountNumber {
- return 2 as AccountNumber;
-}
-
-function getMoneyForAccount(accountNumber: AccountNumber): AccountBalance {
- return 4 as AccountBalance;
-}
-
-// This will compile successfully.
-getMoneyForAccount(createAccountNumber());
-
-// But this won't, because it has to be explicitly passed as an `AccountNumber` type.
-getMoneyForAccount(2);
-
-// You can use opaque values like they aren't opaque too.
-const accountNumber = createAccountNumber();
-
-// This will not compile successfully.
-const newAccountNumber = accountNumber + 2;
-
-// As a side note, you can (and should) use recursive types for your opaque types to make them stronger and hopefully easier to type.
-type Person = {
- id: Opaque<number, Person>;
- name: string;
-};
-```
-*/
-export type Opaque<Type, Token = unknown> = Type & {readonly __opaque__: Token};