some deletions

[dotfiles/.git] / .config / coc / extensions / node_modules / coc-prettier / node_modules / boxen / node_modules / ansi-regex / readme.md

diff --git a/.config/coc/extensions/node_modules/coc-prettier/node_modules/boxen/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md b/.config/coc/extensions/node_modules/coc-prettier/node_modules/boxen/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 22db1c3..0000000
--- a/.config/coc/extensions/node_modules/coc-prettier/node_modules/boxen/node_modules/ansi-regex/readme.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-# ansi-regex [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/chalk/ansi-regex.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/chalk/ansi-regex)
-
-> Regular expression for matching [ANSI escape codes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code)
-
-
-## Install
-
-```
-$ npm install ansi-regex
-```
-
-
-## Usage
-
-```js
-const ansiRegex = require('ansi-regex');
-
-ansiRegex().test('\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m');
-//=> true
-
-ansiRegex().test('cake');
-//=> false
-
-'\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m'.match(ansiRegex());
-//=> ['\u001B[4m', '\u001B[0m']
-```
-
-
-## FAQ
-
-### Why do you test for codes not in the ECMA 48 standard?
-
-Some of the codes we run as a test are codes that we acquired finding various lists of non-standard or manufacturer specific codes. We test for both standard and non-standard codes, as most of them follow the same or similar format and can be safely matched in strings without the risk of removing actual string content. There are a few non-standard control codes that do not follow the traditional format (i.e. they end in numbers) thus forcing us to exclude them from the test because we cannot reliably match them.
-
-On the historical side, those ECMA standards were established in the early 90's whereas the VT100, for example, was designed in the mid/late 70's. At that point in time, control codes were still pretty ungoverned and engineers used them for a multitude of things, namely to activate hardware ports that may have been proprietary. Somewhere else you see a similar 'anarchy' of codes is in the x86 architecture for processors; there are a ton of "interrupts" that can mean different things on certain brands of processors, most of which have been phased out.
-
-
-## Maintainers
-
-- [Sindre Sorhus](https://github.com/sindresorhus)
-- [Josh Junon](https://github.com/qix-)
-
-
-## License
-
-MIT